There are four positions:
So there are four positions: three are well-known, while the fourth is uncommon.2
The one who performs jarḥ or taʿdīl must also be upright (ʿadl), thorough in verification, and free of partisan bias.3
For example, the testimony of a woman in matters relating to childbirth. [tr.] ↩
See: Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī, 1/51; Iṣlāḥ Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ, 2/321; al-Taqyīd wa-l-Īḍāḥ, p. 119; Imʿān al-Naẓar, p. 262; al-Kifāya, pp. 129 to 130; Fatḥ al-Mughīth, 2/163; Aḥkām al-Fuṣūl, 1/281 to 282; al-Burhān, 1/218; al-Mustaṣfā, p. 129; Muntahā al-Sūl, p. 176; al-Iḥkām by al-Āmidī, 1/310 to 311; al-Maḥṣūl, 4/408 to 409; Nihāyat al-Wuṣūl, p. 168; al-Ibhāj, 2/250; Nihāyat al-Sūl, p. 268; Qawāṭiʿ al-Adilla, 1/349. ↩
Imām al-Nawawī said: "It is incumbent upon the one who criticises to fear Allāh, exalted is He, in this; to verify thoroughly; and to beware of laxity in criticising one who is sound from any defect, or in finding fault with one whose fault is not yet apparent. The harm of jarḥ is grave: it is a perpetual ghība (backbiting), it nullifies the man's aḥādīth, it strikes down his transmission of the Sunnah of the Prophet ﷺ, and it overturns a ruling from the rulings of the religion." (Sharḥ Muslim, chapter on isnād being part of the religion, 1/20). See also: Qāʿida fī l-Jarḥ wa-l-Taʿdīl and Qāʿida fī l-Muʾarrikhīn by al-Tāj al-Subkī, in Arbaʿ Rasāʾil fī ʿUlūm al-Ḥadīth, pp. 19 to 80. ↩
The Ḥanafīs classify narrators by ʿadāla, ḍabṭ and fiqh, with the mastūr as a disputed third category and the majhūl, whose narration falls into five cases
The science of jarḥ and taʿdīl: its two grounds, ʿadāla and ḍabṭ, when jarḥ must be explained, when it overrides taʿdīl and who needs tazkiya.
Al-shādhdh is what a single narrator transmits alone, raising doubt in the mind of the critic; this is also al-munkar, and the muḥaddithūn treat the two as one.
When the addition of a thiqah narrator is accepted: positions of al-Tirmidhī, Ibn Ḥibbān, Muslim, al-Ḥākim and the Ḥanafīs, with the majlis distinction.