There are four positions:
So there are four positions: three are well-known, while the fourth is uncommon.2
The one who performs jarḥ or taʿdīl must also be upright (ʿadl), thorough in verification, and free of partisan bias.3
For example, the testimony of a woman in matters relating to childbirth. [tr.] ↩
See: Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī, 1/51; Iṣlāḥ Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ, 2/321; al-Taqyīd wa-l-Īḍāḥ, p. 119; Imʿān al-Naẓar, p. 262; al-Kifāya, pp. 129–130; Fatḥ al-Mughīth, 2/163; Aḥkām al-Fuṣūl, 1/281–282; al-Burhān, 1/218; al-Mustaṣfā, p. 129; Muntahā al-Sūl, p. 176; al-Iḥkām by al-Āmidī, 1/310–311; al-Maḥṣūl, 4/408–409; Nihāyat al-Wuṣūl, p. 168; al-Ibhāj, 2/250; Nihāyat al-Sūl, p. 268; Qawāṭiʿ al-Adilla, 1/349. ↩
Al-Nawawī said: "It is incumbent upon the one who criticises to fear Allāh, exalted is He, in this; to verify thoroughly; and to beware of laxity in criticising one who is sound from any defect, or in finding fault with one whose fault is not yet apparent. The harm of jarḥ is grave: it is a perpetual ghība (backbiting), it nullifies the man's ḥadīths, it strikes down his transmission of the Sunnah of the Prophet ﷺ, and it overturns a ruling from the rulings of the religion." (Sharḥ Muslim, chapter on isnād being part of the religion, 1/20). See also: Qāʿida fī l-Jarḥ wa-l-Taʿdīl and Qāʿida fī l-Muʾarrikhīn by al-Tāj al-Subkī, in Arbaʿ Rasāʾil fī ʿUlūm al-Ḥadīth, pp. 19–80. ↩
The Ḥanafīs classify narrators into four (or, on some accounts, five) groups, including the al-mastūr and majhūl categories with their five-case treatment.
The science of jarḥ and taʿdīl, the two grounds of evaluation, when criticism overrides praise, and who needs tazkiya.
Al-shādhdh is that which a single narrator has transmitted alone, raising doubt in the mind of the critic; this is also the definition of al-munkar. Statements of the early imāms show the two are one.
When the addition of a thiqa narrator is accepted: positions of al-Tirmidhī, Ibn Ḥibbān, Muslim, al-Ḥākim and the Ḥanafīs, with the majlis distinction.